Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-settings.php on line 512
Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-settings.php on line 527
Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-settings.php on line 534
Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-settings.php on line 570
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1244
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1442
Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 306
Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103
Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/cache.php on line 431
Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/query.php on line 61
Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/theme.php on line 1109
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266
Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266
Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 31
Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/http.php on line 61
Strict Standards: Declaration of Simple_Archive_Category_Walker::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-content/plugins/simple-archive-generator/simple_archive.php on line 160
Strict Standards: Declaration of Simple_Archive_Category_Walker::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-content/plugins/simple-archive-generator/simple_archive.php on line 160 discussions « Zero Gravity Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/kses.php on line 1002
Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/kses.php on line 1003
Ah, but how about the Cecropis Daurica? They average about 30 grams, thus you would need 151 or so, assuming of course they can lift ten percent of their body weight.
The Red-Rumped Swallow? They do make it to England. Mostly a Mediterranean bird though. Hmmm. Nice choice. They were spotted at Eyemouth Borders in November I think.
Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/kses.php on line 1002
Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/kses.php on line 1003
Ah… high-modulus polyethylene. Hmmm… That would work, but again genetic engineering would produce a larger specimen with outstanding plumage. You are forgetting that more birds would increase the chance of tangling thus making an asset into a liability and reducing the power to weight ratio into something less than optimal.
Hmm… it all depends on the distance and distribution plus the bird itself. Being a bird that forms flocks, I’m thinking less than one percent. So it is a feasible prospect.
European. African swallows are non-migratory.
However the Barn Swallow is the most common swallow in Europe. It weighs about 16–22 g (0.56–0.78 oz).
Let us say that it can lift 10% of it’s body weight… say 1.9 grams. I’m guessing 240 barn swallows.
Ah, but how about the Cecropis Daurica? They average about 30 grams, thus you would need 151 or so, assuming of course they can lift ten percent of their body weight.
The Red-Rumped Swallow? They do make it to England. Mostly a Mediterranean bird though. Hmmm. Nice choice. They were spotted at Eyemouth Borders in November I think.
Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/kses.php on line 1002
Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/kses.php on line 1003
The one in Lunan bay got eaten though.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/tayside_and_central/6147042.stm
Ah, pity that. How about the Tachycineta bicolor?
Ah, the Tree Swallow. Wonderful plumage, that. Pity about the power to weight ratio. Even lower than the other two.
Ahh, but with genetic engineering…
Or Heterosis. I think we could get a 5 oz migratory bird. Perhaps with an African Swallow crossbreed.
Nah. You want the Progne subis. 55 grams of coconut carrying goodness…
Nice choice. And one with a spectacular plumage.
And if not we can still fall back on genetic engineering…
No. Let’s not rely on genetic engineering, even though it would make for a superior specimen with outstanding plumage.
However we still have not considered the load bearing structure. I suggest Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene.
Ah… high-modulus polyethylene. Hmmm… That would work, but again genetic engineering would produce a larger specimen with outstanding plumage. You are forgetting that more birds would increase the chance of tangling thus making an asset into a liability and reducing the power to weight ratio into something less than optimal.
Ah point. What percentage do you think will become entangled?
Hmm… it all depends on the distance and distribution plus the bird itself. Being a bird that forms flocks, I’m thinking less than one percent. So it is a feasible prospect.