Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-settings.php on line 512

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-settings.php on line 527

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-settings.php on line 534

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-settings.php on line 570

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1244

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1442

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 306

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/cache.php on line 431

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/query.php on line 61

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/theme.php on line 1109

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 31

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/http.php on line 61

Strict Standards: Declaration of Simple_Archive_Category_Walker::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-content/plugins/simple-archive-generator/simple_archive.php on line 160

Strict Standards: Declaration of Simple_Archive_Category_Walker::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-content/plugins/simple-archive-generator/simple_archive.php on line 160

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-settings.php:512) in /home/www/dianajuncher.dk/zg/wp-includes/feed-atom-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: discussions 2019-08-14T13:37:40Z WordPress http://www.dianajuncher.dk/zg/?feed=atom&p=0 By: Brd Wchr Brd Wchr http://www.dianajuncher.dk/zg/?p=88&cpage=1#comment-358 2011-06-01T23:39:29Z 2011-06-01T23:39:29Z Hmm… it all depends on the distance and distribution plus the bird itself. Being a bird that forms flocks, I’m thinking less than one percent. So it is a feasible prospect.

]]> By: KNO3 KNO3 http://www.dianajuncher.dk/zg/?p=88&cpage=1#comment-140 2010-04-29T01:59:04Z 2010-04-29T01:59:04Z Ah point. What percentage do you think will become entangled?

]]> By: Brd Wchr Brd Wchr http://www.dianajuncher.dk/zg/?p=88&cpage=1#comment-135 2010-04-10T07:10:40Z 2010-04-10T07:10:40Z Ah… high-modulus polyethylene. Hmmm… That would work, but again genetic engineering would produce a larger specimen with outstanding plumage. You are forgetting that more birds would increase the chance of tangling thus making an asset into a liability and reducing the power to weight ratio into something less than optimal.

]]> By: KNO3 KNO3 http://www.dianajuncher.dk/zg/?p=88&cpage=1#comment-102 2010-02-13T21:57:09Z 2010-02-13T21:57:09Z No. Let’s not rely on genetic engineering, even though it would make for a superior specimen with outstanding plumage.

However we still have not considered the load bearing structure. I suggest Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene.

]]> By: Brd Wchr Brd Wchr http://www.dianajuncher.dk/zg/?p=88&cpage=1#comment-96 2010-01-21T08:53:52Z 2010-01-21T08:53:52Z Nice choice. And one with a spectacular plumage.

And if not we can still fall back on genetic engineering…

]]> By: KNO3 KNO3 http://www.dianajuncher.dk/zg/?p=88&cpage=1#comment-94 2010-01-16T02:14:17Z 2010-01-16T02:14:17Z Nah. You want the Progne subis. 55 grams of coconut carrying goodness…

]]> By: Brd Wchr Brd Wchr http://www.dianajuncher.dk/zg/?p=88&cpage=1#comment-93 2010-01-12T00:20:16Z 2010-01-12T00:20:16Z Or Heterosis. I think we could get a 5 oz migratory bird. Perhaps with an African Swallow crossbreed.

]]> By: KNO3 KNO3 http://www.dianajuncher.dk/zg/?p=88&cpage=1#comment-92 2010-01-07T19:35:31Z 2010-01-07T19:35:31Z Ahh, but with genetic engineering…

]]> By: Brd Wchr Brd Wchr http://www.dianajuncher.dk/zg/?p=88&cpage=1#comment-91 2010-01-06T21:32:44Z 2010-01-06T21:32:44Z Ah, the Tree Swallow. Wonderful plumage, that. Pity about the power to weight ratio. Even lower than the other two.

]]> By: KNO3 KNO3 http://www.dianajuncher.dk/zg/?p=88&cpage=1#comment-90 2010-01-05T01:55:05Z 2010-01-05T01:55:05Z Ah, pity that. How about the Tachycineta bicolor?

]]>